Daily 14 - Mar 16

Class Performance

Students: 85 | Mean: 4.22 | Median: 4.5 | SD: 0.60

Scores ranged from 2.5 to 5 out of 5 points.

Score Distribution

Performance by Question

Questions

Q1: Population Regression Coefficients Minimize _____

The population regression coefficients minimize the MSE (mean squared error) between the outcome and the regression approximation.

  • Writing “linear” or “error” — Related concepts but the specific answer is MSE.
  • Writing “squared error” without “mean” — Must include “mean” for the full concept.
  • Writing “dispersion” — Dispersion describes variability in general, not the regression objective function.

Q2: OLS Estimator of Beta_1

cov(x,y) / var(x) — the sample covariance of x and y divided by the sample variance of x.

  • Very few errors — Most students correctly wrote the formula. Well done!
  • Minor notation differences — Some used summation form; both are acceptable as long as the structure is correct.

Q3: Return to Schooling from “Level” Regression (Table 3)

The average return to another year of schooling is 29.6 cents (or 29.455/29.655).

  • Writing “30 cents” — Close but not precise enough for full credit; the table shows approximately 29.6.
  • Writing “5.2%” — This is from the log regression, not the level regression. Read column headers carefully.
  • Writing “50 cents” or other wrong values — Misreading the table.

Q4: Frisch-Waugh Residual Interpretation

The residual from a regression of x₁ on x₂. This is the Frisch-Waugh theorem.

  • Swapping x₁ and x₂ — We regress x₁ on x₂, not x₂ on x₁.
  • Listing x₂ twice — Writing “residual, x₂, x₂” is a copying error.
  • Incomplete answers — Must clearly state all three parts.

Q5: Return to Schooling from Table 4

The average return is 7.5 (percent) and the coefficient is statistically significant.

  • Writing “is not” significant — The coefficient is statistically significant.
  • Wrong values (1.5, 15, 75%) — Misreadings of the table.
  • Writing “7.3” or “7.6” — Close but imprecise.

Key Takeaways

Strengths: MSE concept well understood | OLS formula mastered | Residual interpretation mostly correct.

Review:

  • Level vs. log regressions — 29.6 cents from level, 5.2% from log
  • Frisch-Waugh — Regress x₁ on x₂ (not the reverse) to get the residual
  • Read tables carefully — Match values to the correct column and specification