Daily 19 - Apr 01

Class Performance

Students: 89 | Mean: 3.20 | Median: 3.5 | SD: 0.58

Scores ranged from 1 to 4 out of 4 points.

Score Distribution

Performance by Question

Questions

Q1: Deaths Rise at Age 21 (Figure 1)

Deaths from all causes rise by roughly 10 per 100,000 between the month before and after age 21.

  • Writing “12” or “13” — Too high. The figure shows approximately 10.
  • Writing “8” — Too low. Read the y-axis discontinuity carefully.
  • Close values (11) — Received partial credit.

Q2: Key RD Assumption

Average potential outcomes are continuous at the cutoff value of the running variable.

  • Excellent performance — Nearly all students correctly identified “continuous.”
  • “Continuity” accepted — Acceptable synonym for the same concept.

Q3: NHIS Characteristics and Age 21

Observed characteristics are unrelated to whether the individual turned 21 in the month of their interview.

  • Very few errors — Nearly all students correctly wrote “unrelated.”
  • Why it matters — If characteristics were related to the cutoff, it would suggest manipulation of the running variable.

Q4: Quadratic Specification Results (Table 3)

Turning 21 increased deaths by roughly 9.5 per 100,000, with 8.5 (or ~90%/almost all) attributed to external causes.

  • Writing “10, 8” or “10, 9” — Close but imprecise. The quadratic estimates are approximately 9.5 and 8.5.
  • Wrong values (2, 3, 4) — From different rows or specifications.
  • Missing “external” — Must identify external causes (accidents, injuries).

Key Takeaways

Strengths: RD continuity assumption mastered | NHIS balance check understood | Figure reading mostly accurate.

Review:

  • Figure 1 — Deaths rise by about 10 per 100,000 at the age-21 cutoff
  • Quadratic specification — 9.5 total deaths, 8.5 from external causes
  • RD validity — Continuity of potential outcomes + balance of characteristics support the design